ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(RLPN) for cT2 renal tumors in international multi-centers.Methods This study was conducted to collect information on surgical procedures performed by RLPN and robot assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RRN) in nineteen international urological centers from January 2012 to December 2017.RLPN were performed in 159 patients (118 males and 41 females),with the average age of (59.3 ± 13.2) years,body mass index(BMI) of (28.7 ± 5.4)kg/m2,preoperative GFR of (77.3 ± 22.1) ml/min.RRN were performed in 219 patients,with the average age of (62.0 ± 12.9) years,BMI of (28.7 ±6.1) kg/m2,preoperative GFR of (71.4 ± 20.3) ml/min.There was no statistical difference between the two groups in gender and BMI.The age of the patients in RLPN group was younger than that in RRN group,and the preoperative GFR was better.The patient's baseline demographics,perioperative data,tumor pathology,oncologic outcomes,and renal function (GFR) were recorded.Results All 378 cases underwent successful surgery.The operation time of RLPN was 150 min(65-353 min),which was shorter than that of RRN [180 min(85-361 min),P ＜ 0.001].The intra-operative blood loss of RLPN was more than that of RRN [150 ml (40-3 000 ml) vs.100 ml (10-1 100 ml),P ＜ 0.001].The incidence of intra-operative complications were not statistically different between the two groups [5.7％ (9/159) vs.3.2％ (7/219),P =0.240].The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in the RLPN group than that in RRN group [19.5％ (31/159) vs.10.5％ (23/219),P =0.014],but there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications of grade 3 or above [4.4％ (7/159) vs.2.3％ (5/219),P =0.246].The recurrence-free survival rate of RLPN group was higher than that of RRN group [91.4％ (117/128) vs.81.9％ (167/204),P =0.013],and RLPN group was more conducive to renal function protection (P ＜ 0.001).Conclusions RLPN for cT2 tumors can obtain effective tumor control rate and better renal function preservation.It could be an acceptable alternative for surgical management of cT2 tumors.
ABSTRACT
Propósito Se intentó determinar la incidencia, hallazgos patológicos, factores pronósticos y resultados clínicos para pacientes con CCR papilar clínicamente localizado. Métodos Demográfico, Se recopilaron hallazgos clínicos y patológicos en todos los pacientes con CCRP sometidos a cirugía en cuatro centros médicos académicos. El punto final primario fue la supervivencia específica del cáncer (CSS). La supervivencia sin recaída (RFS) y la supervivencia general (OS) fueron puntos finales secundarios. Kaplan- Se obtuvieron estimaciones de Meier y se usaron modelos de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para evaluar predictores de mortalidad y recaída. Resultados Identificamos 626 CCPR, de los cuales 373 (60por ciento) fueron del tipo 1 y 253 (40 por ciento) fueron del tipo 2, con tres cuartas partes de todos los tumores siendo pT1. En comparación con los pacientes con tipo 1, aquellos con tipo 2 eran mayores (edad media: 63 frente a 61; (AU)
Purpose We aimed to determine incidence, pathologic fndings, prognostic factors and clinical outcomes for patients with clinically localized papillary RCC. Methods Demographic, clinical and pathologic fndings were collected on all patients with PRCC undergoing sur-gery at four academic medical centers. The primary end-point was cancer-specifc survival (CSS). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Kaplan Meier estimates were obtained, and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess predictors of mortality and relapse. Results We identifed 626 PRCC, of which 373 (60 pertcent) were type 1 and 253 (40 pertcent) were type 2, with three-quar-ters of all tumors being pT1. Compared to patients with type 1, those with type 2 were older (mean age: 63 vs 61; (AU)